2015.03.13,

Viewpoint

‘Data journalism is not a lone wolf sport’

author_posts/anna-barseghyan
Anna Barseghyan
twiterfacebook

Journalist

Eva Constantaras is an American investigative data journalist who has participated in various international projects aimed at transparent governance and the fight against corruption.

She is one of the “10 women paving the way in digital media and technology,” according to Journalism.co.uk.

Eva has worked with USAID, the World Bank, Hivos, and Google. As a journalist, she has collaborated with The Seattle Times, El Mundo, and El Confidencial, as well as journalism blogs (PBS MediaShift, Open Knowledge Foundation, Knight-Mozilla OpenNews).

Eva finds that in the age of social media, when people read the news first on Twitter and Facebook, the journalist’s job is no longer to be the first to tell the news but to get to the heart of the issue and, with the help of data, explain why something is happening.

What is the most essential thing about data journalism?

I think the most essential thing about data journalism is a curiosity to get to the bottom of the story. So when you take an issue like a hospital shutting down, a regular journalist probably will cover a hospital shutting down and interview a couple of people about why it shut down.

A data journalist will go a little bit deeper and look at the hospital’s budget and see was it overspent in a certain area or look at a local budget to see if the funding of a hospital was cut. So a data journalist is trying to find out what the reasons are behind the public losing access to healthcare or losing access to other public services, to basically trying to improve the quality of life of the journalist’s audience and the way government works.

What is the formula for a successful data journalism product?

There is a couple of things that you have to keep in mind. One of the really important things is don’t forget your job as a journalist is to tell a good story.

People don’t care about data — people care about people. So if you don’t have a human face to your story, no matter how interesting or how compelling your data is, people want to read about other people’s human stories.

Data journalism is attractive because journalists see that they can use data to really explain the forces behind the issue, so they can be the ones that really explain why something is happening. 

So multimedia reporting is really good in those cases, you can have a video that tells us the story of someone impacted by a particular issue.

You can have a strongly written narrative piece in a magazine or investigative journalism platform that takes someone through an explosion of the story and really helps people understand how this data issue is impacting real people’s lives.

What is attractive about data journalism?

The media in lots of places around the world is facing an  industry crisis. People are looking at Twitter and Facebook for breaking news, and a journalist’s’ job isn’t really to be the first person at the news story anymore. His or her job now is to be the best source of information about that story.

So data journalism is attractive because journalists see that they can use data to really explain the forces behind the issue, so they can be the ones that really explain why something is happening. They are not explaining what is happening anymore; they’re explaining why.

And I think that really for journalists across the world who are really worried about their jobs and about the future of the media industry, they see this as actually a really great opportunity to improve the quality of their work and make their own society much more important. They really feel the public service mission by explaining to citizens and helping them connect and become more engaged decision-makers and become more involved in local governance through data journalism decision-making.

How is data journalism changing traditional journalism?

I think data journalism is changing journalism in part just because the nature of information is changing. So with the Internet there’s more and more information available to citizens, but it’s difficult for citizens to know what information they should trust. So what data journalism provides is trusted, reliable information that’s relevant to its audience.

So there’s more information available, but what data journalism produces is information that citizens need to know to make more informed decisions, to take better care of their family, and to participate more in their government and their society in a way that’s more informed. The information that’s out there might not necessarily be relevant to the problems they are facing and the choices they need to make.

There is a lot of data out there. How can the journalist verify the information they collect?

I usually advise journalists to develop a “news nose” for data. Journalist aren’t statisticians, experts, or researchers, but what they do have is a kind of a sense of when something is a little bit strange. So we give them some basic skills of what to look for in terms of what is the organization that collected the data:

  • do they have a reputation for solid research;
  • if it’s a survey do we know how many people were surveyed;
  • was random sampling selected; 
  • and then we look at basic things like how recent is the data;
  • can we compare it to other data sources on the same topic to verify that the results are pretty much in line from source to source. 
Journalist’s’ job isn’t really to be the first person at the news story anymore. His or her job now is to be the best source of information about that story. 

So it’s basically queues like that that make journalists aware if there’s something suspicious about the data.

Something that we always suggest is “If you are not sure, ask the source; call up the source of the data, ask them how they collected it, ask them how they can prove their reliability.”

I think a lot of data producers are pretty open to answering those kind of questions, and it’s the journalist’s job to ask questions, so this is just another question to ask your source.

Data journalism involves not only writing articles, but also a doing a little bit of programming. What are the skills that a journalist should have in order to work in data journalism?

You are right. Data journalism can involve a very diverse skill set, so again, needed are more statistics knowledge for data analysis, graphic designers to do visualisations of the data, developers that do news apps, and programming to make the data interactive.

I think it’s much more common and more realistic for data journalism teams or open data communities that have the skill set between them to come together.

Journalists usually work alone, so one of the hardest things for journalists to learn about data journalism is it’s not a lone wolf sport. You have to work together as a team for the strongest possible product.

Data journalism is pretty new for Armenia. What tips do you have for Armenian journalists?

Well, actually data journalism is pretty new everywhere. The handy thing for journalists in countries like Armenia that are really just getting started is that there is an international community that’s willing to help out new data journalists; there are hashtags they can follow on Twitter; and there are lots of groups, so if a journalist doesn’t have particular skills or is stuck, there is always the international community that’s really interested in helping out.

So I think tapping into that international community is really essential both to get help on your own projects and also to work on cross-border projects and international global issues involving data.

It’s a very good idea for Armenian journalists to work with neighboring countries and other journalists that are also increasing their data skills, so that they can learn together.

Interview by Anna Barseghyan


Add new comment

Comments by Media.am readers become public after moderation. We urge our readers not to leave anonymous comments. It’s always nice to know with whom one is speaking.

We do not publish comments that contain profanities, non-normative lexicon, personal attacks or threats. We do not publish comments that spread hate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *