I recently read something interesting. I quote, “There is a noticeable change among the people who are ready to pay for consuming reliable content. If in 2019 6% of respondents would pay for such information, in 2021 that figure is 13%. In both cases, the respondents are ready to pay no more than 4,000 AMD a month.”
What is interesting here is not the double growth, but the fact that our society has already approached the threshold where it will be possible to make qualitative changes in the media field from the index close to the statistical error.
If the survey is at least a little closer to reality, that is, people are really ready to invest money for quality information, then we get a monthly budget of about one million dollars.
If we consider the fact that a part of that 13% is cross-breeding crowds (members of the same family or friends who are ready to share a subscription), then one million a month is a very modest estimate, with all reservations.
According to various estimates (exact numbers, it seems, no one knows) the Internet advertising market in Armenia annually reaches 5-7 million dollars. In other words, it turns out that society is ready to spend more money for more quality and reliable content.
Today, we have a situation where online media depends either on banner advertising (where there is a sharp decline after the ban on betting advertising) or on affiliate programs with various organizations.
In the second case, it mainly observes a sharp decline in quality, the placement of eye-catching advertising materials, which does not have a positive effect on audience involvement.
In the field of native advertising, quality work can be found on special platforms. And, naturally, the undeclared political and economic financing remains, the darkest and most influential from the negative point of view. Which leads to misinformation, propaganda, and an increase in the number of manipulative materials. That is why people agreed to pay if only to leave this field of propaganda behind.
Probably one of the problems is that most of the media do not even try to work with the public, to attract public money. This is not an easy task.
It is one thing for a person to agree to pay, it is another thing for him to really pay.
On the other hand, in the current situation, there is probably no other solution for most of the editorial offices. If there is no desire to fulfill an economic or political order, in the current situation it becomes almost impossible for the majority to gain financial independence.
It is clear that some news outlets will still be able to survive, taking advantage of some positions in the advertising market. For the rest, there are only a few ways left in the current economic situation of the country. Either fulfill political orders and be accused by a part of the population of being sellouts or sit on grants and be accused by a part of the population of being sellouts, or try to take the path of public cooperation and try to form a more flexible budget, which will also include subscriptions.
Let’s mention the activation of the Patreon platform in Armenia as a positive trend. This is a platform that allows people to support various programs by paying. Armcomedy, Repatriarch or News from Hell can be good examples for traditional online news media of how to start such a financial partnership with the community.
Moreover, the 13% mentioned at the beginning of the article should be added to the numerous residents of the Diaspora, who are also, if not more, interested in receiving quality and verified, objective news from the homeland.
Samvel Martirosyan
The views expressed in the column are those of the author's and do not necessarily reflect the views of Media.am.
Add new comment
Comments by Media.am readers become public after moderation. We urge our readers not to leave anonymous comments. It’s always nice to know with whom one is speaking.
We do not publish comments that contain profanities, non-normative lexicon, personal attacks or threats. We do not publish comments that spread hate.