media.am | People are the media

Futured Post Verified

The Facebook Fact-Checking Program In Armenia: What You Should Know

Երևանի հեռուստատեսային աշտարակ

The Most Viewed Programs: 2021 Second Quarter

Our Media And The Russian Masquerade

Nune Hakhverdyan

Post-War Coverage Of The Karabakh Conflict: May

Anahit Danielyan

There Was A Lot Of Political Advertising, But It Wasn’t Always Targeted

War Zone: Subjective Advice To Journalists

Positive Trends In The Culture Of Campaign Coverage: Monitoring

Carpets: Encrypted Messages

Nune Hakhverdyan

Four Main Topics Of Misinformation In Armenia: Report

False Information: Armenian Government Aircraft Has Entered Azerbaijani Territory

Restrictions On Freedom Of Information

The Money Received By Regional TV Stations From The Elections

The Last Days Of Calm?

Samvel Martirosyan

Vaccines Against COVID-19: The Media In Armenia Provided A Platform For Misinformation

Karine Ghazaryan

On The Scene: Lika Zakaryan

Pre-Election Campaign Money And TV Broadcast

“What Would Have Been Blood Is Becoming A War Of Emojis”

Nune Hakhverdyan

About Post-War Information Policy: Between Fraud And Mistrust

The European Parliament Has Not Adopted A New Resolution On Armenian Captives

Ophelia Simonyan

Post-War Coverage Of The Karabakh Conflict: April

Anahit Danielyan

The “Armenia” Alliance Bought The Most Airtime

Shushi Fireworks Did Not Mark the Civil Contract Victory in the Elections

Arshaluys Barseghyan

The Opposite Effect Of Aggressive Campaigns

Nune Hakhverdyan

Fake News: The “Shirinyan-Babajanyan” Bloc Stated That The Shooter Was A Member Of Their Bloc

Karine Ghazaryan

Fake News: Alen Simonyan Voted At The School After A. Margaryan And Did Not Leave The Area For 15 Minutes

Ophelia Simonyan

Fake News: The Sponsor Of Pashinyan’s Daughter’s Toy Is The LGBT Community

Ophelia Simonyan

Manipulations about the Number of People Attending Pashinyan’s Rally

Ophelia Simonyan

Manipulation regarding Heineken with Azerbaijani Label

Ophelia Simonyan

“By And Large, It Will Be The Same, No Matter Who Comes To Power Because There Are Not Many Steps In This Game”

Nune Hakhverdyan

Monitoring: The Struggle Between “The PastThe pre-election campaign in the media is more in line with the RA legislation and international standards than the pre-election campaign in general. This is the conclusion of the monitoring team of the Yerevan Press Club. As in the previous report, during the actual campaign (June 7-18) all 6 Armenian national TV channels (First Channel of the Armenian Public Television, A-TV, Armenia, Yerkir Media, Kentron, Shant) and the work of Public Radio of Armenia were examined. The First Channel of Public Television and “Yerkir Media” TV showed the greatest attention to the elections among the national broadcasters. The total amount of airtime provided by these two media outlets during the election campaign was almost twice as high as the corresponding total of the other five media outlets surveyed. “Kentron” and “Shant” TV companies are in the second group in terms of the level of election coverage. The authors have noticed a certain change in the coverage of the elections by “Kentron” TV. If before it competed with “Yerkir Media” with the intensity of coverage, this time it does not pay much attention to the campaign. Previously, the “Prosperous Armenia” party was in the center of “Kentron’s” attention, but this time during the first six days of the pre-election campaign, the “Civil Contract” party is the obvious leader in terms of both volume and frequency of references. By the way, the references to the “Prosperous Armenia” party on the air of “Kentron” were exclusively neutral. “Armenia,” A-TV and Public Radio have significantly lagged behind in terms of attention to this pre-election campaign and have been limited to media coverage of the elections. As in the previous stage, on June 7-12, the media devoted the main airtime to the “Civil Contract” party and the “Armenia” Alliance. Although the other 23 political forces, unlike the data of the previous report, were not left out of attention. This time, too, “Civil Contract” is a leader in terms of both volume and frequency of coverage. In almost half of the cases (117 out of 251), the references to the ruling political force were accompanied by negative assessments and only in three articles it was covered in a positive context. This time there were 15 negative and 26 positive references to the “Armenia” Alliance , 13 of which were recorded on the “Yerkir Media” TV channel. The “I have honor” bloc, which is identified with the third president of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan, and the “Armenian National Congress” party, headed by the first president of Armenia Levon Ter-Petrosyan, were mainly presented on the negative side. This circumstance allowed the authors of the research to conclude that the already widespread description of the elections as a “struggle of the past and the present” is well-founded. It is also mentioned that the theme of the whole election campaign is focused on the assessments of the modern history of Armenia (last 30 years). At the center of the debate between the political forces participating in the elections are the security issues of Nagorno Karabakh and the country, which leads to a sharp and emotional confrontation. Mane GrigoryanThe pre-election campaign in the media is more in line with the RA legislation and international standards than the pre-election campaign in general. This is the conclusion of the monitoring team of the Yerevan Press Club. As in the previous report, during the actual campaign (June 7-18) all 6 Armenian national TV channels (First Channel of the Armenian Public Television, A-TV, Armenia, Yerkir Media, Kentron, Shant) and the work of Public Radio of Armenia were examined. The First Channel of Public Television and “Yerkir Media” TV showed the greatest attention to the elections among the national broadcasters. The total amount of airtime provided by these two media outlets during the election campaign was almost twice as high as the corresponding total of the other five media outlets surveyed. “Kentron” and “Shant” TV companies are in the second group in terms of the level of election coverage. The authors have noticed a certain change in the coverage of the elections by “Kentron” TV. If before it competed with “Yerkir Media” with the intensity of coverage, this time it does not pay much attention to the campaign. Previously, the “Prosperous Armenia” party was in the center of “Kentron’s” attention, but this time during the first six days of the pre-election campaign, the “Civil Contract” party is the obvious leader in terms of both volume and frequency of references. By the way, the references to the “Prosperous Armenia” party on the air of “Kentron” were exclusively neutral. “Armenia,” A-TV and Public Radio have significantly lagged behind in terms of attention to this pre-election campaign and have been limited to media coverage of the elections. As in the previous stage, on June 7-12, the media devoted the main airtime to the “Civil Contract” party and the “Armenia” Alliance. Although the other 23 political forces, unlike the data of the previous report, were not left out of attention. This time, too, “Civil Contract” is a leader in terms of both volume and frequency of coverage. In almost half of the cases (117 out of 251), the references to the ruling political force were accompanied by negative assessments and only in three articles it was covered in a positive context. This time there were 15 negative and 26 positive references to the “Armenia” Alliance , 13 of which were recorded on the “Yerkir Media” TV channel. The “I have honor” bloc, which is identified with the third president of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan, and the “Armenian National Congress” party, headed by the first president of Armenia Levon Ter-Petrosyan, were mainly presented on the negative side. This circumstance allowed the authors of the research to conclude that the already widespread description of the elections as a “struggle of the past and the present” is well-founded. It is also mentioned that the theme of the whole election campaign is focused on the assessments of the modern history of Armenia (last 30 years). At the center of the debate between the political forces participating in the elections are the security issues of Nagorno Karabakh and the country, which leads to a sharp and emotional confrontation. Mane Grigoryan And The Present” In The Media

Manipulation: A Massive Explosion Hit Mingachevir

Ophelia Simonyan

AUTHORS

Amplifier

Adrineh Der-Boghossian

Journalist

Writer, screenwriter

Vahram Martirosyan

Journalist

Media researcher

Samvel Martirosyan

Future biophysicist

Journalist

Ophelia Simonyan

Art critic, journalist

Nune Hakhverdyan

Managing Director of Media Initiatives Center

Nouneh Sarkissian

Editor of PanARMENIAN.Net

Nikolay Torosyan

Writer by calling

Mesrop Harutyunyan

Tech reporter

Publicist

Lusine Hovhannisyan

Digital Anthropologist

Lusine Grigoryann

Journalist, semiotician-to-be

Karine Ghazaryan

Journalist

Anahit Danielyan

Journalist, film critique

Karen Avetisyan

Writer

Hovhannes Yeranyan

Journalist

Hakob Karapetyan

Photographer

Physicist by education, journalist by occupation

Gegham Vardanyan

Journalist

Gagik Aghbalyan

Multimedia journalist

Christian Ginosyan

Journalist

Arshaluys Barseghyan

Writer

Journalist

Armen Nikoghosyan

Journalist

Anna Barseghyan

լրագրող, խմբագիր

Վասակ Դարբինյան

MEDIA OUTLETS

This website is maintained within the framework of Media for Informed Civic Engagement project.

The project is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

The contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.

The site was developed within the framework of Internews'

Audience Understanding and Digital Support (AUDS) project with the support of Sweden