



{"id":5677,"date":"2016-01-21T12:31:29","date_gmt":"2016-01-21T12:31:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/media.am\/would-you-help-or-beat-a-journalist\/"},"modified":"2016-01-21T12:31:29","modified_gmt":"2016-01-21T12:31:29","slug":"would-you-help-or-beat-a-journalist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/critique\/2016\/01\/21\/5677\/","title":{"rendered":"Would You Help or Beat a Journalist?"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote>\n<p>If, by strange coincidence, the subject of Turgev&#8217;s poem was to repeat, I think many people today too would prefer to drink their tea first&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The reason for this piece was one of my guests at Vem radio station, an ethnographer (I don&#8217;t have the authority to publish their name, so please forgive me).<\/p>\n<p>When on air I said that we expect from them a response to some question, he retorted: &#8220;I&#8217;m not obliged to justify your expectations. I am OBLIGED to offer my knowledge to he who pays me. Whereas I answer your questions out of good will; by the way, securing your fee. I accepted the invite to speak on radio because the conversation is broadcast in its entirety. I no longer want to speak on television: journalists, who, as a rule, don&#8217;t know the subject matter, attribute most of my thoughts to themselves, presenting them as their own remarks, leaving only a small portion of my remarks and often out of context too.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The guest&#8217;s indignation was, in essence, justified.<\/p>\n<p>In Armenia, there are a dozen TV companies, numerous newspapers, and websites. It seems that there should be healthy competition: high quality, intelligent, ensuring high standards for journalists and programs. But there&#8217;s the impression that each news outlets works toward serving the interests of a specific official or political group.<\/p>\n<p>And the rest \u2014 whether journalists are intelligent or not, programs have content or are meagre \u2014 just like morning programs, no longer matters.&nbsp;TV viewers, readers are generally outside the scope of a news outlet&#8217;s interest, as they&#8217;re not clients and they don&#8217;t pay.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Though even in the case of the First Channel, when the TV station operates at the taxpayers&#8217; expense, news programs are especially biased and have a weak connection to reality.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Localizing the ethnographer&#8217;s remarks, we can note: we should acknowledge the information reaching us from the airwaves, the press, and the news websites as an expression, a gesture of the good will of news outlets, which could&#8217;ve been much worse or not.<\/p>\n<p>Consequently, purely rhetorical is the question of whether a journalist has time before writing an article, producing a reportage, or conducting an interview to prepare, TO THINK\u2026<\/p>\n<p>The journalist&#8217;s personal approach is very important. A journalist can be outside the system if they respect (a) their profession, (b) the person whose time they&#8217;re stealing by inviting them to an interview, and (c) the reader or TV viewer consuming their product.<\/p>\n<p>Literary critic, journalist Hovik Charkhchyan once said that on occasion of his newly published book, Armenia&#8217;s Public TV Company invited him to participate in a morning show broadcast live. After greeting the guest, the journalist asked him to immediately describe his book in a few words: what book is it and what is it about, so that the questions asked on air don&#8217;t come from, say, aerodynamics. Mr. Charkhchyan, perplexed, refused to participate in the program and left.<\/p>\n<p>In general, the practice of respecting the interviewee and readers or TV viewers is not yet very common.<\/p>\n<p>A paradox: the more a journalist doesn&#8217;t respect his profession and considers everyone more foolish than he, the more pretentious he is and has no difficulty in appearing ignorant and vulgar. In short, he doesn&#8217;t sense the difference between foolishness and boldness.<\/p>\n<p>Two friends are sitting at a table and drinking tea. A sudden noise arose in the street. They hear plaintive groans, violent curses, bursts of malicious laughter.<br \/>\n&#8220;Someone is being beaten,&#8221; remarked one of the friends, glancing out the window.<br \/>\n&#8220;A criminal? A murderer?&#8221; inquired the other. &#8220;Look, no matter who it is, such retaliation shouldn&#8217;t be tolerated. Let&#8217;s go and advocate for him.&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8220;But it&#8217;s not a murderer they&#8217;re beating.&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8220;Not a murderer? Is it a thief then? It makes no difference: let&#8217;s go and rescue him from the mob.<br \/>\n&#8220;It&#8217;s not a thief either.&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8220;Not a thief? Is it a cashier, a railway employee, an army contractor, a Russian Maecenas [art patron], a lawyer, an editor, a social reformer?\u2026 In any case, let&#8217;s go and help him.<br \/>\n&#8220;No. They are beating\u2026 a newspaper reporter.&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8220;A reporter? Oh, tell you what: Let&#8217;s finish our tea first.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Ivan Turgenev wrote this prose poem, <em>The Reporter<\/em>, in 1878.<\/p>\n<p>Has the attitude toward journalists changed almost 140 years later?<\/p>\n<p>If, by strange coincidence, the subject of Turgev&#8217;s poem was to repeat, I think many people today too would prefer to drink their tea first&#8230;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Lilit Avagyan<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If, by strange coincidence, the subject of Turgev&#8217;s poem was to repeat, I think many people today too would prefer to drink their tea first&#8230; The reason for this piece was one of my guests at Vem radio station, an ethnographer (I don&#8217;t have the authority to publish their name, so please forgive me). When<a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/critique\/2016\/01\/21\/5677\/\"> Read the full article&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5675,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5677","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-critique","author_posts-lilit-avagyan"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5677","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5677"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5677\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5675"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5677"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5677"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5677"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}