{"id":26806,"date":"2021-03-15T17:37:01","date_gmt":"2021-03-15T17:37:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/media.am\/?p=26806"},"modified":"2021-03-30T11:18:52","modified_gmt":"2021-03-30T11:18:52","slug":"the-44-day-war-in-the-russian-and-turkish-state-press","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/media.am\/en\/verified\/2021\/03\/15\/26806\/","title":{"rendered":"The 44-Day War In The Russian And Turkish State Press"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Media Initiatives Center (MIC) conducted <\/span>research<\/span><\/a> in 2020 studying the three main topics on the Armenian agenda of the same year: the coronavirus, the Artsakh issue and the Lanzarote Convention.<\/span><\/p>\n

In this article, Media.am studied the information policy of the Russian and Turkish state media during the Second Artsakh War.<\/span><\/p>\n

As in all wars, the state information of the direct participants in the conflict, Armenia and Azerbaijan, turned into propaganda, and the media was mainly subject to censorship. There was a wider field of study and opportunity in the case of two regional actors, the state media of Russia and Turkey.<\/span><\/p>\n

The study of the information field of these countries was more important against the background of the 44-day war, as they now have a military presence in the conflict zone and control the ceasefire regime.<\/span><\/p>\n

Thus, we have observed the coverage of the Russian and Turkish state media from the beginning of the war (September 27) to its end (November 9), subjecting it to quantitative and qualitative analysis.<\/span><\/p>\n

Our goals were to find out what information policy was pursued by the state media of the two countries, with what emphasis they spoke about the second Artsakh war, we also highlighted the context under which the coverage was made.<\/span><\/p>\n

If you do not have time to read: What did we find out?<\/span><\/p>\n